Thank you to all those who contacted me about the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
This Bill will allow Government Ministers to amend or repeal all legislation carried over from our membership of the EU – thought to consist of over 2400 pieces of law – with nearly no parliamentary scrutiny. If the Government does not pass a replacement to any piece of this legislation before the end of next year, it would expire and no longer be law in our country. I am concerned that this puts at risk hard-fought rights and protections for British workers, consumers and the environment while diminishing democratic scrutiny and accountability in key areas of British law.
Many constituents contacted me about Amendment 36 to the Bill which was tabled by a cross-party group of MPs. I supported this amendment, which would have required the Government to publish a list of every piece of legislation affected and allowed for parliamentary oversight of this process. It is completely unacceptable that the Government wants the power to potentially allow thousands of pieces of legislation to be removed from our statute book at the end of this year and we have no idea of the exact legislation it would apply to. Unfortunately, this amendment was voted down by Government MPs.
More broadly, I am completely opposed to this Bill, and I spoke in the debate in the House of Commons to criticise the Government’s lack of openness and transparency. The Bill would cause enormous levels of uncertainty as we would have no idea what our laws will consist of in 12 months’ time. I share concerns that the Government is seeking to use this Bill to embark on a process of mass deregulation. The laws at risk are not cumbersome red tape but rights and protections British people rightly expect.
I therefore voted against the Bill as a whole and will continue to oppose it.
We do need to establish the future status of laws carried over from our time in the EU, but I fundamentally disagree with the Government’s approach to doing this. The Government is wrong to seek to give itself the power to sweep away key areas of law, of great importance to people across the country, with no scrutiny, no say and no certainty over their replacements.
Instead, the Government should bring forward a positive set of proposals about where the law needs to change or whether something can be done better, and allow MPs to scrutinise those proposals on behalf of our constituents.